They're clamping down on the "cheating" involved in the Oscars. Take a look here.
A rundown of the new Academy restrictions:
- After Oscar nominations are announced on January 24 (until Feb. 21), no receptions may be held following screenings.
- During this period, Academy members (and nominees) may not attend non-screening events celebrating that year’s nominees.
- Filmmakers may only participate in two Q&A panels at screenings that Academy members have been invited to.
- Remember, no crap talking the other guys on Twitter or Facebook or other social media. Or else, suspension and then bye bye membership! Got it, Nicolas Chartier?
- Also, this will be the first year in which studios may send digital screeners to voting members for consideration.
But will it do any good? Will it make a difference?
There's always going to be a prestige issue with the Oscars, particularly Best Picture.
Why does a "Comedy" never win? Why does Animation get its own category - should every film not be measured on the same scale? Just two issues. There are many.
Looking at the Best Picture winners over the years:
The King's Speech (2010) - I thought Black Swan was vastly superior in terms of writing, acting, and scope. But The King's Speech was a film about a historical figure and was "important". So it won. It was always going to because of that alone.
The Hurt Locker (2009) - again, I thought District 9 was superior. But The Hurt Locker was "important" and based on fact. Whereas aliens have yet to invade (apparently).
Shakespeare in Love (1998) - I've never understood this one. How Saving Private Ryan didn't win is a mystery to me. But then.....Shakespeare in Love is about a historical figure.
Titanic (1997) - better than Good Will Hunting? Seriously?! Ah....but Titanic actually happened!
Yes, I know I'm generalising, but the point is that it's never a level playing field. Prestige is always there.
Maybe it's better that 10 films are nominated now (instead of five, since 2009). But does it mean the bottom of the barrel gets a little scraped?
Some Best Picture nominations from the last two years:
Inglourious Basterds - seriously?! Other than one very well-written scene early on, it's a bit of a train wreck, surely?
Avatar - yes, it's technologically wonderful. But what does it bring to the table? Not much.
Inception - I know a lot of people love it, but for me, the logic doesn't hold up half the time, it's not that visually interesting, the performances are sub-par, and it all seems like an inferior version of The Matrix.
Okay, rant over. You may now go back to your coffee/beer/whisky.